EXEMPLARY N&V CASES

Nixon & Vanderhye has the capability to handle, and routinely does handle, major litigations on behalf of our clients with a highly qualified cadre of very experienced trial attorneys, staff and technical support personnel. Indeed, we have been recognized by our peers and legal experts as being one of the top six Washington D.C. area firms for handling complex patent litigation matters, and we are often engaged by larger firms to assist them with complex patent law and technology issues facing their clients.

An exemplary listing of just some of the litigation matters we have handled for our clients is provided below (parties represented by N&V are underscored).

• Derek Webb et al. v. Mikohn Gaming Corporation et al., Case No. 3:02-CV-1838-HTW-LRA (S.D. Miss. 2007)
  
• Whirlpool Corporation and Whirlpool Patents Company v. LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and General Electric Company (W.D. Mich.)
  
• Nintendo of America Inc. and Siras.com Inc. v. Orion America Inc. and Orion Sales Inc. (W.D. Wash.)
  
• Alpex Computer Corp. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. and Nintendo of America (S.D.N.Y.)
  
• Atari Games Corporation v. Nintendo of America and Nintendo Co., Ltd. (N.D. Cal.)
  
• Coyle v. Nintendo of America, Inc. (C.D. Cal.)
  
• Gussin v. Nintendo of America, Inc. (C.D. Cal.)
  
• Rackman v. Nintendo of America Inc. and Nintendo Co., Ltd. (S.D.N.Y.)
  
• Sitrick v. Nintendo of America, Inc. and Sega of America, Inc. (N.D. Ill.)
  
• Sharp Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Viewsonic Corporation, Benq Inc., Benq America, Envision Peripherals Inc. d/b/a AOC Monitors, ProView Technology, Inc., Sceptre Technologies, Inc., Acer Incorporated, and Acer America Corporation (N.D. Cal.)
  
• AU Optronics Corporation v. Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation (E.D. Tex.)
  
• AU Optronics Corporation v. Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation (D.N.J.)
  
• Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd., Sharp Corporation, et al. (E.D. Va.)
  
• Positive Technologies, Inc. v. Benq America Corp., Fujitsu General America, Inc., Hitachi America, Ltd, JVC Americas Corp., Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America, Inc., NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., Panasonic Corp. of North America, Philips Electronics North America Corp., Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc., Polaroid Corp., ProView Technology, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Sharp Electronics Corp., Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C., and V, Inc. (E.D. Tex.)
  
• Advanced Interactive, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. et al. (including Toshiba Consumer Products, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc., and Toshiba Corporation et al.) (N.D. Ill.)
  
• Cooper, PIXEL Instruments Corp. & Technology Licensing Corp. v. Toshiba America Consumer Products (N.D. Ohio)
  
• IP Innovation v. Toshiba Corp. (N.D. Ill.)
  
• Parental Guide of Texas, Inc. v. Funai Corporation, Inc., Toshiba America Consumer Products, Inc. et al. (E.D. Tex.)
  
• Plasma Physics Corporation et al. v. Fujitsu et al. (including Toshiba Corporation et al.) (E.D.N.Y.)
  
• TechSearch LLC v. Robert Bosch Corporation,, Toshiba America Consumer Products, Inc., et al. (N.D. Ill.)
  
• Avenue A, Inc. v. 24/7 Media, Inc. d/b/a 24/7 Real Media, Inc. (W.D. Wash.)
  
• Hexcel Corporation v. Advanced Textiles, Inc. and H. Keith Hutson (W.D. Tex.)
  
• The Gillette Company v. American Safety Razor Company (D. Mass.)
  
• Warner Lambert v. American Safety Razor (D. Del.)
  
• Polymedica Industries, Inc. v. Beam Tech, Ltd. (D. Colo.)
  
• Checkmate Electronics v. Lundy Corporation (E.D. Va.)
  
• Foseco Metallurgical, Inc. and Foseco International Limited v. Ashland Inc. and Ashland Specialty Chemical Company (N.D. Ohio)
  
• Foseco Metallurgical, Inc. and Foseco International Limited v. Conestoga Foundry Supply Co., Inc. (M.D. Pa.)
  
• Joy-Mark, Inc. v. Foseco Metallurgical, Inc. (E.D. Mich.)
  
• Recycling Sciences International, Inc. v. Gencor Industries, Inc. et al. (N.D. Ill.)
  
• Standard Havens Products, Inc. and Cedarapids, Inc. v Gencor Industries, Inc. (American Arbitration Ass'n, Wash. D.C.)
  
• In re Certain Point of Sale Terminals and Components Thereof (Int’l Trade Comm’n) (representing Ingenico Corp. and Ingenico S.A.)
  
• In re Certain Signature Capture Transaction Devices and Component Parts Thereof, and Systems that Employ Such Devices (Int’l Trade Comm’n) (representing Ingenico Corp., Ingenico S.A. and SMTC Corp.)
  
• DataTreasury Corp. v. Ingenico S.A. and Ingenico, Inc. (E.D. Tex)
  
• RDM Corporation and Research Development and Manufacturing Corporation v. Ingenico Corp. and Ingenico, Inc. (D. Minn.)
  
• Verve L.L.C. v. Ingenico Corp. (N.D. Ga.)
  
• Verve, LLC v. Verifone, Inc., Cybernet, Inc., Hypercom Corporation, Ingenico Corporation, Lipman USA, Inc., Thales E-Transactions, Inc., Trintech, Inc. (N.D. Cal.)
  
• Mars Elec. Int’l, Inc. and Mars, Inc. v. International Currency Techs. Corp. and International Currency Techs. Inc. (D. Del.)
  
• InterTherapy, Inc. v. Cardiovascular Imaging Systems, Inc. (C.D. Cal.)
  
• Ekchian v. Lucas Automation & Control Engineering Inc. (E.D. Va.)
  
• Metretek, Incorporated v. Metscan Corporation (W.D.N.Y.)
  
• Phillips Petroleum Company v. Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Inc. et al. (S.D. Tex.)
  
• Moore North America, Inc. v. Poser Business Forms, Inc. (D. Del.)
  
• Moore North America, Inc. v. Standard Register Co. (W.D.N.Y)
  
• A.R.I. Flow Control Accessories v. Nelson Irrigation Corporation (E.D. Wash.)
  
• Nu Metrics, Inc. v. HMR Communications, Inc. (W.D. Pa.)
  
• Nu Metrics, Inc. v. Ash Instrumentation Inc. (W.D. Pa.)
  
• Nystrom v. TREX Co., Inc. and TREX Co., LLC (E.D. Va.)
  
• eSpeed, Inc.; Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P.; and CFPH, L.L.C. v. BrokerTec USA, L.L.C.; Garban, L.L.C.; ICAP PLC; OM Tech. US INC.; and OM Tech. AB (D. Del.)
  
• Citibank/TTI v. Online Resources & Communications Corporation (E.D. Va.)
  
• AT&T v. Racal Milgo Skynetworks, Inc. (W.D.N.C.)
  
• Barnes Engineering Company v. The Racal Corporation (S.D. Fla.)
  
• PC Connector Solutions LLC v. Smart Disk Corp. and Fuji Photo Films USA Inc. (M.D. Fla.)
  
• Fox Industries, Inc. v. Structural Preservation Systems, Inc. (D. Md. & Fed.Cir.)
  
• Taylor Made Group, Inc. ad Taylor Made Systems, Inc. v. Ameritex, Inc. (D.S.C.)
  
• Taylor Made Group and Taylor Made Systems, Inc. v. Veralex, Inc. dba Prelco (N.D.N.Y.)
  
• Taylor Made Group, Inc. and Taylor Made Systems, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Windshields, Inc. (N.D.N.Y.)
  
• Tru-Fire Corp. v. Tomorrow’s Resources Unlimited, Inc. (W.D. Wisc.)
  
• 1st Media LLC v. TouchTunes Music Corporation, Ecast, Inc., Fatburger Corp., Rock-Ola Mfg. Corp. (D. Nev.)
  
• Arachnid, Inc. v. TouchTunes, Inc. and Technical Maintenance Corp., Inc. (N.D. Ill.)
  
• Ecast, Inc. v. TouchTunes Music Corporation (N.D. Cal.)
  

CASE RESULTS DEPEND UPON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE AND DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE CASE UNDERTAKEN BY NIXON & VANDERHYE.